Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thome Rodrigo (prince)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -no verification,no article. Star  Mississippi  01:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Thome Rodrigo (prince)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The citation here (which doesn't seem super reliable) is only a single passing mention of the subject and I did not find any other coverage on Google or Google Books. He was involved with the Convention of Malvana but sources there do not mention him either. Reywas92Talk 17:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sri Lanka. Reywas92Talk 17:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Radioactive  (talk) 18:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Delete Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only source I can find is karava.org, which is the history website of the Karava Caste, and it is known for its skewed, biased narrative. Therefore, it cannot be considered a reliable source. Chanaka L ( talk ) 02:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. We don't want to perpetrate hoaxes, and dubiously-sourced people can easily be that. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 11:09, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I think the name Thome Rodrigo was the Portuguese nickname given to the Karava prince who signed the convention. Will contact the source's site and find their source. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 18:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This isn't a basis to keep, you need sources first. Nickname or not, I don't see why he'd be notable without substantive coverage beyond knowing he was (potentially) one of eight people who signed this convention. Reywas92Talk 18:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.