Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomson TO16 (prototype)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  14:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Thomson TO16 (prototype)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I suggest that this and the related models are not appropriate for separate articles.  DGG ( talk ) 09:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Why ? The article exists on the French Wikipedia, and although sources are not the best, they do exist. I could understand if you suggested a merge with the TO16 article though...
 * What other articles you wish to delete ? Again, they all exist on the French Wiki, and the have good sources (including manuals). 4throck (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to Thomson TO16 seems obvious. Hyperbolick (talk) 20:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I can agree to that and I'll merge it. 4throck (talk) 08:31, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: I believe has created both  and Thomson TO16 in the last few days, and has now determined to place all information in Thomson TO16 making  a redirect.  (Which puts this AfD in a bit of a weird state as Thomson TO16 (prototype) redirects to Thomson TO16 which does not have an AfD notice leaving people initially as a bit of a surprise.  I personally see no advantage to a redirect .  Although we ar out of procedure, and given the merge has happened, Id like to see the redirect  deleted (there's no attribution issues as 4throck was the author or the merged source) (Simplest by  speedying Db-g7 the thing) and closing this AfD. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC) *Delete: This is because the merge(content copy) of Thomson TO16 (prototype) to Thomson TO16 has already been done by the creator (and sole contributor) of Thomson TO16 (prototype) (In good faith but whilst under AfD but "technically" without specific pre-consensus). I don't really see the need for a redirect from a search point of view as anyone would likely look for Thomson TO16 so probably best to dump in. The is a possibly a marginal case for use of the redirect it it has cats appropriate to a 68k processor intel of an Intel (I think I'm right in saying that from memory and my memory has better things to remember) but it doesn't and I'd still by !voting delete if it did. But do a redirect if necessary but closer please do something! Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.