Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomsonfly Flight 4263


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The only thing that crashed is this article. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Thomsonfly Flight 4263

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable aviaiton incident. Birds get sucked into airplane engines all the time. ...William 19:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William 20:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions....William 20:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions....William 20:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom .... Other than the bird no one died, or was injured, My condolences to the birds parents at this difficult time. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  20:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * (Sidenote: best delete rationalization ever. Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû  (blah?) 01:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC))


 * Delete, hardly as newsworthy as the Malaysian plane disaster last week. RWCasinoKid (talk) 20:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 20 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Going through the suggestions at WP:AIRCRASH, this incident clearly does not reach the notability standards even to be included on the airline's page. No hull loss, no resultant change in procedures, not a criminal act (eg terrorism), no loss of life, etc. The incident does not even appear to pass the general notability guidelines, namely WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT (the historical significance requirement.) Move for deletion, perhaps a brief mention on the bird strike article at the most. -- Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû  (blah?) 01:45, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Easily fails WP:NOTABILITY. Isn't a WP:AIRCRASH. --Jersey92 (talk) 18:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mjroots (talk) 20:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Bird ingestions occur all the time. The death of the birds has more notability than the article itself...--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 20:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - routine incident that doesn't merit mention anywhere per WP:AIRCRASH and separately fails WP:GNG. Incidentally, the one reliable source in the article refers to a different event! The Whispering Wind (talk) 16:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.