Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thorn Cycles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence presented in discussion that this subject merits inclusion in Wikipedia. Missvain (talk) 22:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Thorn Cycles

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:ORG. I didn't find any sources after searching as well. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. There something here, though maybe not Thorn Ltd itself but its products and/or SJS cycles, which would probably be best incorporated in a single article per WP:NOPAGE, and which may need a title change. Like most cycling-related topics any material isn't going to be low-hanging fruit in the usual online sources, but may require a little digging. There's some reasonable secondary coverage here for example to help establish notability (for SJS as a "nationally significant mail order supplier of bikes and bits"). I'll dig around for more ... Alexbrn (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment thanks for bringing this source in sight. That's one to begin with. We definitely need more to qualify for notability as per WP:NCORP. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 07:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:06, 19 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Unless references are found and presented, this fails NORG/GNG. A review of one of their products doesn't make them notable. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are no good sources cited. Fails WP:GNG Irasa Nira Yaa (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.