Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thornbury Athletic FC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Thornbury Athletic FC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:GNG. Non-noteable soccer team. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:23, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

--GenuineEdits (talk) 03:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Not delete I believe that the article Thornbury Athletic FC should not be deleted and I also believe that they are indeed a notebale soccer club. They are one of if not the most diverse clubs in Australia and in only their second year they were able to win the VicSoccer league and their reserves coming runners up. Now they are competing in State League they are expected to do well and even earn promotion in the coming years.
 * Comment Of the 48 teams in the VicSoccer league, 4 (including Thornbury) have WP pages. The other three teams have notable wins in other leagues, making them noteworthy enough to receive their own pages. This is simply a case of WP:TOOSOON. They haven't won anything (yet) of substainal notoriety. Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 00:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:02, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete for now. Much routine sports reporting but very little about the club as an organisational entity.   TOOSOON.  Aoziwe (talk) 12:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.