Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Those Dancing Days


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 03:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Those Dancing Days

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Questionably notable band; sources do not appear to meet WP:BAND standards SkierRMH  ( talk ) 07:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep; As I've said elsewhere they are quite notable. They get a lot of play on one of the UK's biggest music TV stations (MTV2), were nominated for being the best band in Sweden by MTV, etc... Yeah they're no Arctic Monkeys but far, far, less notable bands have articles. --Josquius (talk) 12:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. They don't make WP:MUSIC on releases yet, but do on other criteria - they seem to have had plenty of coverage and have gigged in the UK as well as in Sweden and have appeared on Swedish television.--Michig (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. A Google search found plenty of significant coverage that should be adequate to meet notability criteria. I've expanded the article to include this.--Michig (talk) 13:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - There seems to be relatively decent quality in the references. matt91486 (talk) 14:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I removed my own speedy deletion tag to this article when the author added that the band has been nominated for a major award. That alone is enough of a notability assertion to me. The source to support this assertion is now present. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 14:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The reliable sources provided are sufficient for proving notability. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The band looks notable enough, although if someone's pointed out that they don't meet WP:MUSIC alone then this clearly cannot be a snowball keep even if there is consensus to keep.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 13:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.