Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thought Screen Helmet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete g5, created by banned user, see User talk:Gandalf the Beige. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Thought Screen Helmet

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable product. No reliable sources.  Anna Lincoln  11:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Comment I hope sources can be found to enable this entertaining and interesting article to be kept.Fainites barley scribs 11:46, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. If it were a notable product, Merge to Tin foil hat, as an example.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 16:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Only sources I can find are bloggers making fun of it, or non-reputable UFO paranoia sites. -Verdatum (talk) 17:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep It is a non-reputable UFO paranoia product, so surely the most reliable sources are non-reputable UFO paranoia sites. Common fig (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The Above vote is from the article creator. This account has since been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet. -Verdatum (talk) 18:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable joke product, not backed by reliable sources. Note: the sock that created this article canvassed my !vote  ⇦REDVERS⇨ 10:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * How about this: ^ "'Anti-alien' hats for Wales". The Sun. 22 July 2008. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/ufos/article1451303.ece. Retrieved 27 January 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Common fig (talk • contribs) 12:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Not a reliable source. ⇦REDVERS⇨ 13:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment How about merging with Alien abduction ? Fainites barley scribs 13:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * There's nothing to merge. It's either a joke or some loonjob. Either way, it sort of goes against the whole encyclopedia-y thing we've got going on here. ⇦REDVERS⇨ 13:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not a joke. I thought that people would find this article interesting (and amusing as well, possibly). And I object to the term "loonjob". Common fig (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No it's not just a joke though it is funny. I suppose it might be a hoax site but belief in alien abduction/mind control is a very real phenomenon. The problem is the lack of sources, particularly as to efficacy in reducing alien abduction experiences by 99%.Fainites barley scribs 16:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.