Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thranx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Humanx Commonwealth races. Virtually everything in this article is covered in the list already, so I don't see what else is to merge. Spinning out the material again and expanding with the sources discussed may be done at editorial discretion. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Thranx

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable fictional planet, no source is given.  JL 09  q? c|undefined 16:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:55, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * merge or redirect, as above.   DGG ( talk ) 20:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * delete, merge or redirect as above. Simonm223 (talk) 22:06, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * dmr per nom and simonm223.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Subject is a fictional alien race, not a planet. Edward321 (talk) 00:48, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thranx for bringing that to our attention. :) Mandsford (talk) 16:26, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge to Humanx Commonwealth. I think that if someone wanted to spin that section out to an article called "Species in the Humanx Commonwealth Series" would be okay.  It's a notable science fiction series and the various planets and humanoid aliens are an important part of the setting, but none of them-- except for the human race and the planet Earth -- are individually notable on their own. Mandsford (talk) 16:26, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, secondary analysis can be found. . The main point Foster was making; hideous resemblance to insects, but they have good souls, has been discussed in secondary sources. I won't cry if this is merged, since the information should be covered in Humanx Commonwealth, but it is not like the others nominated today.  Abductive  (reasoning) 01:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Humanx Commonwealth. Edward321 (talk) 23:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Got enough content to fill its own article, and it has secondary analysis in the books found by Abductive.  D r e a m Focus  01:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.