Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrash 'n Treasure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. There is one dissenting voice to "keep", but the fact that the subject lacks secondary source coverage is decisive here. There is a reasonable case that the subject ought to receive secondary source coverage due to its list of highly notable guests, and that the lack of secondary sourcing is due to the podcast being very new, but at this point in time the consensus is that it is too soon for an article. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Thrash 'n Treasure

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Podcast doesn't seem to meet WP:NMEDIA - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:NMEDIA does not refer to podcasts - these are covered under WP:WEB. I would posit that a new podcast developed during a global pandemic is going to take time to receive external, independent notice given the myriad podcasts created in the last few years and far less notice being given by the press to what is no longer a new medium. However, I would add that the notability of the guests alone should make this a more notable podcast for discussion.Wightbear — Preceding undated comment added 10:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Since you are the creator of this article, I ask that you please refer to WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:TOOSOON. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:13, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Few mentions in Gizmodo Australia and one on syfy, but it appears to be the same article. A few more sources would help, but I can't find any. Oaktree b (talk) 16:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Primary sources spam with no claim of importance. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I've declined the speedy, there's enough credible assertion with the number of notable guests its had to be enough for the lower CSD bar. Ged  UK  08:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)