Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threat actor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. needs more sources, but there is sufficient coverage from my searches on Google for there to be an article on this topic. (non-admin closure) jcc (tea and biscuits) 14:51, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Threat actor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable. Ethanlu121 (talk) 20:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Don't think WP:NOTDICTIONARY applies here. Subject is covered extensively in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 22:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Needs more content, but more than just a definition. Margalob (talk) 15:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article needs expansions and improvements not deletion. WP:NOTDICTIONARY does not apply in my opinion.BabbaQ (talk) 16:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Used frequently in both anti-terrorism and cyber security areas; many instances in Google books. Can be expanded, but I don't think it's worth deleting. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Three long sentences is a stub. It is more than a DICDEF. Bearian (talk) 14:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.