Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thred taper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Thred taper

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete advertisement for nn product Mayalld (talk) 15:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. There appear to be articles about this machine in Assembly magazine (June 1 2000) and in Machine Design here. These are very specialist magazines, but still probably warrant keeping the article. JulesH (talk) 16:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no attempt to establish notability. All news.google hits are ads or "product announcements".  No scholar hits.  Don't see how this could become a referenced article.  NJGW (talk) 16:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject isn't sufficiently notable to justify coverage. PTFE thread tape is notable, a machine to automate the simple hand process isn't. If there's a thread tape article, then this deserves a mention and reference, but no more. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Brief mention, with refs, now added to Thread seal tape Andy Dingley (talk) 18:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.