Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three-Source hypothesis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to synoptic problem.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 11:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Three-Source hypothesis

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

The three-source hypothesis is a notable topic in relation to the synoptic problem, which has been discussed by scholars for over a hundred years, but this article, despite the title, is not about the three-sources hypothesis. It is a commentary on a paper written by a retired IT worker and amateur biblical scholar published a couple of weeks ago in what doesn't appear to be a reliable peer-reviewed journal, and as such is original research. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree with the nominator's analysis. --Malleus Fatuorum 21:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to synoptic problem. This article is clearly giving undue weight to a single author, regardless of his qualifications or the standing of the journal. EALacey (talk) 10:55, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge in to synoptic problem - it has some useful content, but has too much OR to stay by itself. Bearian (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Which content would you include? It looks to me like the whole thing is a summary of Ron Price's article which, if we're going to cite it, shouldn't be our only source. EALacey (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.