Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three (TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Modussiccandi (talk) 07:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Three (TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a difficult title to search, but there seem to be no obvious, relevant GNews results, and considering its very short run (<2 months) I'm convinced that it likely fails WP:GNG. Only source is a book which I cannot check. This is a 1998 TV series that aired on The WB; it has no relation to the 2012 CBS show also titled 3. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 07:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 07:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep -- washington post article ; New York Times review . Just going onto page two of google, I see Deseret News . Pretty easy GNG pass. Just had to do a basic google search for 'Three "Evan Katz" WB'. Google News searches honestly don't do a great job picking up older TV shows, but conventional google can work. matt91486 (talk) 17:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. In addition to Matt's sources, I found (Associated Press) and  (New York Daily News). There's ample coverage for a GNG pass, in my view, although I certainly understand how that might not be apparent at a first glance. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.