Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three Degrees of Separation Acquisition Strategy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Three Degrees of Separation Acquisition Strategy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Original synthesis. Nowhere in the sources is this concept ever mentioned by this name, and Google returns nothing but this article and a few Wikipedia bot edit summaries. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 23:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. We've taken your comments into consideration and decided to replace this page with a new page focused on the Three Degrees of Separation concept. Jjsharon (talk) 17:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * delete - Possibly an interesting idea for a magazine article or three, which can then be summarized into a wikipedia article. but full WP:OR as it stands.  --Rocksanddirt (talk) 23:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original synthesis likely intended to advertise some consulting business: a customer acquisition model whereby participants reach out to their online social network and email contacts within an invite-only private membership format.  One more version of Make Money Fast on the Internet. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment a couple of the sources are blogs or other unreliable types. Dethlock99 (talk) 20:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - just call it plain old spam, because it certainly looks that way. Bearian (talk) 20:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG, and surely looks like spam. First Light (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, very spammy. Drmies (talk) 18:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable spam. Also Delete Three Degrees of Separation, a duplicate article that appears to have been created to subvert the deletion process. Edward321 (talk) 14:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * delete - non-notable meme coatrack. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 23:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.