Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three Six Zero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Three Six Zero

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Paid advertorial for a non-notable company. There's a carpet-bomb of references, but after I examined every one, all I found was everyday coverage of routine business announcements and/or passing mentions in industry publications. Not the in-depth coverage required of WP:NCORP. In particular, the industry-only coverage fails WP:AUD. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:38, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. I opened up six of the refs at random, the return was 2 x 404, 1 x press release, 3 x no mention. The article reads as promotional and I concur with the nom. Szzuk (talk) 17:57, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Its a target for spam. Fails WP:ORGIND. scope_creep (talk) 18:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of notability. Fails WP:CORP  Velella  Velella Talk 20:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Snow. So patently useless... Den... (talk) 22:13, 9 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.