Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three domain stability of a non-conservative system


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Three domain stability of a non-conservative system

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NOTESSAY. Please, we don't need this going out on the internet. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep WP:NOTESSAY prohibits personal opinions and feelings and so applies more to the nomination than the page in question. The topic here is quite technical but seems to be reasonably notable – see Stability of Discrete Non-conservative Systems or Nonconservative Stability Problems of Modern Physics, for example. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Those references are about a more general topic than the subject of this article. The latter does not even mention Ingerle, the author of the work this article is about. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Ingerle's 2018 book, which the article credits as introducing the idea that the article is about, has been cited 3 times on Google Scholar, only 2 of which were peer-reviewed publications. The 2013 article has been cited 5 times, 1 of which was by Ingerle himself and another 1 in a non-peer-reviewed arXiv preprint. Nothing discusses Ingerle's work in any significant depth. No one besides Ingerle himself uses the terminology that Ingerle introduced. There's no case for wiki-notability here. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per XOR'easter. A theory needs substantially more coverage. - Astrophobe  (talk) 22:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete this appears to be self-promotion, based on the article creator's username and other article creation. No sign of the terminology being notable. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 23:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources above discuss non-conservative stability broadly, not this particular method of three domain stability; there is no basis whatsoever to speedy keep the article. Extra Energy Stability criterion is by the same author as a promotional piece for Ingerle's work that should also go. Reywas92Talk 01:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia has never published original research nor a methods manual. Bearian (talk) 12:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.