Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threequel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Sequel. -Splash talk 02:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Threequel
Delete neologism/dicdef. Postdlf 02:29, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ~800 google results, non-notable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia 03:52 2006-01-29
 * Redirect to Trilogy or Delete (no strong preference). I have heard this term a number of times (and am pretty surprised by the small number of google hits), so the redirect might have some value. ×Meegs 05:28, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sequel as Turnstep suggests below. I hate this word, but my understanding is that it's more of a second sequel than the third of a planned trilogy. In any case, the term should just be mentioned in the destination article, there's no content worth merging. ×Meegs 02:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. If it isn't a neologism it's a dic-def. Marskell 08:40, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to sequel. This is definitely not a neologism (it predates Wikipedia), and deleting will just encourage people to try and recreate it later. Seems perfect as a small section inside of sequel however. Turnstep 19:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This is definately not a neologism, as evidenced by the source, but it is also not a dicdef because it goes into sufficient def. -- User: Henry, Lord of the Dance
 * Redirect to trilogy or sequel. Please do not consider this a keep vote; the content is not useful and is original research. Chick Bowen 01:59, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I accept Meegs's reasoning above. Chick Bowen 02:34, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.