Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threshold Mathematics resolves the Primes Enigma and Riemann Hypothesis.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 00:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Threshold Mathematics resolves the Primes Enigma and Riemann Hypothesis.

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Pseudomathematics and original research. Deprodded by author. Alksub 17:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like an essay to me, unless somebody can prove otherwise Corpx 18:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete from the article: "Being relatively new, there is no readily available fund of sources and references for directly verifying it, although it is now circulating in the world of human thought and so is an element of human culture." But feel free to come back when a fund becomes readily available.  You probably don't want to know what's circulating in my world of human thought right now either. Mandsford 22:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Smacks of OR and unsupported by reliable sources. Zero relevant hits in Google Scholar. Dbromage  [Talk]  23:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources for content, apparently original research. The Primes Enigma & Riemann's Hypothesis: Resolved by Threshold Mathematics was deleted 4 days before this was created. PrimeHunter 03:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Although it makes for an enthralling, don't-believe-my-eyes, "cosmic" reading, obviously delete per all of the above. Isn't there a museum for such rare gems? --Goochelaar 11:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neither Physics Today nor Wikipedia publishes original research. Sorry. Bearian 17:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unadulterated speculation. Now if it were entitled "Voodoo mathematics" I'd have to rethink my position &hellip; ;^> DavidCBryant 23:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, at best. Paul August &#9742; 03:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:NEO. According to SPA author, Threshold Pilot, a company named "Pathway Initiatives Ltd." holds the copyright to the "Threshold" idea; I don't believe one can copyright mathematical theories, so it appears to be more of a "mathematical philosophy" (i.e., speculation). Askari Mark (Talk) 05:05, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If any source even remotely "NPOV" says the Riemann hypothesis has been resolved, it would be on the front page of every newspaper. Michael Hardy 02:49, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * PS: I don't see the usual boilerplate "current event" notice at Riemann hypothesis. Hence....
 * Delete as I just explained in the "Comment" and "PS" above. Michael Hardy 02:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * propose to speedy close as DELETE per strong agreement that article is essentially an essay and original research (to which I too strongly agree). Baccyak4H (Yak!) 12:34, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.