Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrillanthropy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Thrillanthropy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Also, the word reeks of original research. Logan Talk Contributions 16:32, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. Two previous instances by the same author have been speedied—one of them because it was a shameless advertisement for this website, which appears to be responsible for inventing and marketing this neologism. Strong suspicion of coat rack. Favonian (talk) 16:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism. Hairhorn (talk) 17:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: I have relisted the discussion. For some reason, it was not included in the log when first created. Favonian (talk) 13:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism, origin is unsourceable and likely WP:COI, and possible coat rack spam attempt per Favonian. -- Kinu t /c  09:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable neologism. Edward321 (talk) 01:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.