Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrinay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. People are free to create a Wiktionary entry, but this unsourced content may not be fit for copying to Wiktionary.

The article, by, read, in full: "Thrinay is a word from sanskrit language. It has multiple meanings. Trina means throne in Sanskrit. The word Thrinay means one who is seated on throne. It is mainly used to describe Gods and Goddesses in Hindu religion. It is used more in Devi Mahatmya to address Saraswati, one of the three supreme goddesses of Hindu religion. In some Puranas (like Skanda Purana) Saraswati is considered the daughter of Shiva (Shivaanujaa) and in some Tantras she is associated with Ganesha as his sister. Some also consider Thrinay as one of the names of Lord Shiva."  Sandstein  18:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Thrinay

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This should have a Wiktionary entry, if it doesn't have one already. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete and create a Wiktionary entry per nom. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 17:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and redirect with Wiktionary redirect, assuming a Wiktionary page is created. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 17:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Transwiki per nom. (I was wondering if I'd ever fill in the blank space in my AfD Stats...) Vaticidalprophet (talk) 17:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Transwiki As per nom. Setreis (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and soft redirect to Wiktionary, per all above. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I have no objection to deleting the article if it's unfit for Wiktionary. I really can't find any use of this word online, except as a name. That's not to say it's fake, but there may not be enough to even verify its existence. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wiktionary generally includes Sanskrit words written in Devanagari or Brahmic scripts, not the Latin alphabet. It's not entirely clear from this article what words or languages are meant. (Does "a word from Sanskrit" mean "an English word"? or some other language(s)?) Cnilep (talk) 03:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wiktionary has standards too, it's not a dumping ground for Wikipedia's unsourced schlock. – Uanfala (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.