Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrive15


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:22, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Thrive15

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article appears to have been created by a single-purpose account to promote a business that is not of any particular importance soibangla (talk) 16:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. soibangla (talk) 16:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:54, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:54, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete The article is a ref bombed, glorified advert about a clearly non-notable company. So there's zero reason to keep it. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:29, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: References do appear to make it look well sourced, but none stack up to provide meaningful information. The company simply isn't notable at all and readily fails WP:GNG; little appears in search. Company feels scammy too. -- Tautomers (T C) 06:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep has sufficient coverage including these in-depth and, also a mention in Fast Company and few other mentions are from credible publications. Webmaster862 (talk) 02:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP therefore references are required to contain both in-depth information *and* "Independent Content". Both the emails mentioned by Tautomers are promotional "pre-launch" articles and a careful read of those references shows that the information was provided by the company, failing WP:ORGIND. Topic fails NCORP.  HighKing++ 11:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.