Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thru (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Thru (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD removed (I still confirm everything I said there) apparently with the basis that they believed everything listed still suggests notability and substance but it's not actually the case. All sources listed are simply either press releases or trivial mentions. SwisterTwister  talk  17:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  17:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  17:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * delete No coverage beyond standard PR. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:10, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete Ad of non-notable company. Millbug  talk 03:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete -- strictly promotional content; lacks independent coverage. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.