Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunder (CMS)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Thunder (CMS)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable Drupal distribution. The sources in the article, 2 of which are in German, are not reliable. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:22, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I disagree, this distribution is not an obscure topic, since lots of journalists in Germany did report the start of Thunder, and also some international media. I just added another source in English. I don't see why the mentioned sources should not be reliable, since these are both official information and independent media coverage.Juliapradel (talk) 08:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC) — Juliapradel (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment Content of that reference aside, heise.de is reliable source. Non-English page doesn´t mean not-reliable. Pavlor (talk) 09:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Article was created by (now blocked) Hubert Burda Media (talk), which is name of the company behind Thunder (CMS). Pavlor (talk) 09:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Like Pavlor I think heise.de is a reliable source, too, as well as meedia.de. This article has been created by Hubert Burda Media, but doesn’t sound promotional, but only states facts.Dominik.kipar (talk) 11:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC) — Dominik.kipar (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment- The Heise article does not appear reliable. Their business services page states that they use content originating with manufacturers and service providers. (see https://business-services.heise.de/ueber-uns.html); the article is very short, and does little to suggest that the product is notable.Dialectric (talk) 15:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note this is not "Heise business services", but Heise online news. Source for the article is (probably) dpa and its author is Axel Kannenberg - member of ct magazine staff. Pavlor (talk) 15:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Currently the only !votes are from SPAs so I'll relist again to get some independent opinions Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. North America1000 17:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.