Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunder (CMS) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Thunder (CMS)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable Drupal distribution. No reliable sources have been added since the first AfD, which was closed as no consensus. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 22:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment There may be more references in German language media (meedia.de and heise.de are already in the article). I will look for other tech-related sources of this kind (eg. chip.de). Pavlor (talk) 10:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * chip.de is out - owned by Hubert Burda Media. So there are (now in the article) only 2 RS: meedia.de and heise.de - both cover only initial announcement. Pavlor (talk) 17:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Added golem.de reference - again only coverage of the initial announcement. Pavlor (talk) 17:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The product needs to have notability of its own and I don't see enough. There are many CMS available and Thunder seems to be a recently launched variant of Drupal. I would say this is WP:TOOSOON and go for a delete at this point. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.