Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunder Beach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Crumbächer. Spartaz Humbug! 12:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Thunder Beach

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely fails to satisfy WP:NALBUM. While there are a few available reviews, there are no sources that satisfy all three of Sig Cov/Reliable & independent.

Redirect - (to Crumbächer) Along with the band itself, is the only one I felt could potentially be disputed. (The other albums have been redirected for now) Nosebagbear (talk) 22:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 15:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG and NALBUM. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 16:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect to Crumbächer. Their other albums are already directs, I'm OK with just delete if there is a dispute about the redirect. Szzuk (talk) 19:06, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge sources to band (Crumbächer). No need to delete. Redirect phrase has use. czar  21:47, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Crumbächer. Unsure of applicability of merging, but I'm not opposed to it. ––Redditaddict69 <sup style="color:#339900">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(contribs)  05:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I've copied the allmusic ref along and added it next to thunder beach. I also added the general discography source (not from the TB article). The other TB source just indicates charting (not notable charting, I should add), so I didn't feel it was worth adding. If merging was based on sourcing I don't think there's anything else to add from this article. Nosebagbear (talk) 08:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.