Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunder Boogie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Thunder Boogie

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable work by a non-notable artist Jprg1966 (talk) 23:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Jprg1966 (talk)  23:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable music work, no charting singles, no critical notice, no reviews, no sales records. Nothing for GNG or NMsuic. Oaktree b (talk) 02:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete this doesn't appear to be the subject of any substantial coverage. Walt Yoder (talk) 02:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nomination. Not notable. Charsaddian (talk) 09:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - When the band has no article that is an indication that they are non-notable, and if that's true then so are their albums. This one received no pro reviews or any other reliable coverage that I can find, and it's only visible in the usual retail and streaming sites. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.