Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunderblast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Transformers: Cybertron characters. Jayjg (talk) 03:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Thunderblast

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Topic does not seem notable NotARealWord (talk) 23:10, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Fine article in the making. Mathewignash (talk) 23:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Topics that don't meet the requirements in Notability should be deleted even if their any good. NotARealWord (talk) 01:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment If deleted it should redirect to List_of_Transformers:_Cybertron_characters. Mathewignash (talk) 01:50, 29 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge clearly not independently notable, merge to List_of_Transformers:_Cybertron_characters. Black Kite (t) (c) 20:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Google news shows one result, detailed coverage of her. Character had a speaking role in a notable animated series.  Article is filled with information, most/all of which would be lost if '"merged".   D r e a m Focus  22:52, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge - no evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources, as is mandatory per WP:GNG. A short summary in the list will be fine. Claritas § 13:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron, with no explanation as to why this article should be rescued and how that could happen (per ARS instructions).    Snotty Wong   confer 17:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Transformers: Cybertron characters. Not notable enough for its own article.    Snotty Wong   confer 17:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to the character lists, else delete. One of the reasons we even have character lists in the first place is so we don't end up with tons of hopeless articles like this. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:12, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge, I'm not fussed, but this article should not exist. J Milburn (talk) 13:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Centralize discussion and merge and redirect as accordingly decided by Articles for deletion/Transformers centralized discussion. There are so many articles, surely some of them can be lumped. — Code  Hydro  13:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge - fails WP:GNG, but I have no problems with verifiable information in the article being placed somewhere else. Claritas § 15:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This is just more trasnformers fluff.Slatersteven (talk) 20:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to List of Transformers: Cybertron characters pursuant to the guidelines for elements within a notable fictional work listed at Notability (fiction). This is a recurring character. No need to destroy the article or its history as the character may become more significant with future Transformer projects. Inniverse (talk) 14:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge for the sake of building a consensus. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Its been shown time and time again the so called "sources" on this and many other Transformers articles are unreliable :See "Reliable sources for Transformers" Dwanyewest (talk) 01:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.