Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunderdome (drinking game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   16:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thunderdome (drinking game)
This google search brings only two short descriptions of the game, and a bunch of links that have the same text as Wikipedia does. The game does not meet WP:N, WP:V and WP:NOT. It sounds like something a bunch of students came up with one day while watching a Mel Gibson movie. It should be noted that its two appearances on other sites are from the "submit an article" variety. --Wafulz 15:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Probably a very localized tradition.  Mango juice talk 15:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Not-notable and unverifiable. Scorpiondollprincess 16:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete there are some notable drinking games linked from the drinking game page but I doubt any really merit their own article. Fails WP:OR anyway. Yomangani 16:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination Blowski 16:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and fails WP:NFT. --dtony 18:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for all reasons given, and then let's get started cleaning out Category:Drinking games, which has entirely too much cruft. Daniel Case 02:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I've played it, and seen it played. I don't think I know any of the people who posted the article, so it's got some name recognition out there. I've never really thought of it as important enough to warrant an article on wikipedia, more just a fun, nerdy drinking game. 1:20, 8 August 2006 NYYW
 * Ahh...another stupid drinking game. I think that's all we nominate now are drinking games. Delete per nom, non-notable, stupid, fails WP:N, WP:V, WP:NOT, WP:NFT, something made up in school one day, no sources, no external links, unverifiable, should I go on? --S-man 18:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.