Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunderstone (card game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 16:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Thunderstone (card game)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable game by non-notable designer. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  —BurtAlert (talk) 23:45, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Keep Just because the game and designer are not yet famous doesn't mean the game shouldn't have a page. This is a real game with several expansions out already and it has been nominated for an award. As a stub, this page needs some work, but that doesn't mean it should be deleted. J1776 (talk) 20:19, 3 May 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * reply - We don't have articles on things that might become notable someday. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  12:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * This game seems notable enough in the present to garner a nomination for an award and multiple expansions to the base game? What standard is being used to determine 'notability'?J1776 (talk) 14:10, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The game and its expansions are notable enough to have also been reviewed by the Dice Tower J1776 (talk) 11:29, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep from google news there are some wired blog sources, A game review seems to acknowledge it added "some new innovations" and a few minor reviews   . As this is the main game, I think the nomination although a minor award and non-commercial web reviews are sufficient for a board game.Tetron76 (talk) 15:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * weak keep Sources above, plus 2010 JoTa - Best Card Game (Critic/Audience) award, plus and IAR keep for its BGG ranking. Hobit (talk) 00:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Award winning game, translated into multiple languages. Edward321 (talk) 14:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.