Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TiDB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

TiDB

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I PRODed it without realisng it is a recreation of a speedied page. I am at a loss to know what to do with it but I'm pretty sure it's not notable. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:53, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Kudpung! TiDB has been reported online in many Chinese online meida because it's developed by Chinese engineers. Is it okay for me to cite a Chinese website link? Or Can I use the following two links:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10180503 https://www.percona.com/live/plam16/sessions/how-we-build-tidb

--Queenypingcap (talk) 10:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC) Sorry I missed the earlier note. Could you please share your comments on my question below? Thanks! TiDB has been reported online in many Chinese online meida because it's developed by Chinese engineers. Is it okay for me to cite a Chinese website link? Or Can I use the following two links:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10180503 https://www.percona.com/live/plam16/sessions/how-we-build-tidb

--Queenypingcap (talk) 02:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000  ( talk,  contribs ) 00:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I hate to relist this a third time but it does need an assessment from uninvolved editors. Since it's been deleted and recreated [numerous times], a WP:SOFTDELETE won't cut it here. Mkdw talk 07:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw talk 07:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Two of the references in the article pertain to NewSQL, preceding and not mentioning this particular product. The remainder are a mix of online postings and presentation materials from primary sources. None of these satisfy the requirements. (In answer to the query above, there would not be a problem with Chinese language sources, but they would need to be reliable 3rd party sources.) Clearly this is a developing product but it looks at best WP:TOOSOON to demonstrate achieved encyclopaedic notability. The product is mentioned on the NewSQL page which is sufficient (even then, preferably supported by a reliable 3rd party source). AllyD (talk) 12:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree with AllyD's assessment.--greenrd (talk) 23:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.