Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TiToAwesome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

TiToAwesome

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article was created by a registered user, whose sole contribution was spending 15 minutes creating this article back in 2007. I cannot find anything reference to the company. A domain of this name exists, but seems to be of German origin (not Worthing), and there is nothing on the website anyway. The cites are links to a newspaper and radio station main domain, not to any specific story, certainly not about TiToAwesome.

My personal conclusion is "hoax". Putney Bridge (talk) 23:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Hoax or extremely non-notable. 0 gnews hits; the majority of the non-wiki ghits are people telling Tito he said something awesome.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  00:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete as likely misinformation. If this local company truly does have a turnover of 1.5 million pounds sterling, you'd have expected it to have a fair bit of local coverage by now. The link to a page that has nothing to do with the company makes me even more suspicious. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 07:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Prank. Qwfp (talk) 09:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable at best.--Charles (talk) 22:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No links or addresses to the company. After doing a Google search, I've found a website with the same name, but it doesn't look like a company. Techman224  Talk  22:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.