Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiago Casasola


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 00:14, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Tiago Casasola

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Restored at WP:REFUND. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL JMHamo (talk) 12:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 12:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:NSPORT (WP:NSOCCER). The athlete must play in at least one professional league to be considered notable.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above - Fails NSPORT & GNG. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  20:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 14:42, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep neither fails WP:NFOOTBALL nor WP:NSPORT in fact qualifies on account of English Championship as fully professional or Argentine leagues as fully professional. BBC Sport and Sky Sport obviously have a higher opinion as Wikipedia editors as coverage especially on account of a $1m (£800,000) transfer to a British club with substantial interest by FC Barcelona and FC Roma. Notability is therefore unquestionable. GinEgWu (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. NFOOTY clearly states the needs to play in order to be notable not simply be a member of a squad. Additionally,  routine transfer talk is, by long standing consensus, not sufficient to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 19:15, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - He hasn't played in a Fully professional league and he doesn't have any senior international caps either therefore he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. IJA (talk) 18:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Soft Keep U-20 international for Argentina, and signed by a professional club in a professional league this summer.  At worst that's wp:TOOSOON - and I don't have enough Spanish to go through the Argentinian press. Neonchameleon (talk) 04:29, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. – Michael (talk) 23:50, 1 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.