Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiago Klimeck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Tiago Klimeck

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

nn per WP:ONEEVENT Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:27, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. While Klimeck's death was a tragic loss to his family and friends, and the Wikipedia community needs to be respectful, this obituary is properly classified under WP:ONEEVENT. Bigturtle (talk) 14:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As above.TheLongTone (talk) 15:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As above.--Lilduff90 (talk) 18:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is mainly focused on a person's death and does not provide any notability and biographical information on the person. Tomcollett (talk) 06:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete unless somebody can produce other information about him and demonstrate notability. And Introducing... A Leg (talk) 08:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * "Save" . I believe because his death was so unusual, this is the real reason it's being considered for deletion. As for notability, he is as notable as all the Roman Catholic Prelates that is incessantly listed here. Leave Tiago HERE. [USER: Olympiias] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olympiias (talk • contribs) 12:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)  — Olympiias (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * First, votes go in chronological order, so yours goes at the bottom. Second, keep your conspiracy theories, the reason I nominated this is because it's not notable, just as I stated.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:12, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.