Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiamat (Planet)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep Ben Standeven 23:37, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Tiamat (Planet)
For discussion. Had been marked as speedy by user:Denni for nonsense. See also Talk:Tiamat (Planet) Satori 02:18, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, probably speedily as nonsense, or failing those ground as non-notable and non-encyc. Google returns Tiamat 657000 times in a whole gamut of senses none of the first 20ish of which are the 'planet', apart from this Wikipedia article. It's also been added to the Tiamat (disambiguation) page.-Splash 02:24, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Google search for "Zecharia Sitchin Tiamat" returns 1320 hits. So that's why I'm not sure if it qualifies for patent nonsense. Satori 02:28, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok, I owe an apology for not looking around enough. I've retracted my vote and will quietly exit by the side door.-Splash 02:32, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep This article does not contain any non-sense at all. Reference is very clear. Discussion has been going on at Talk:Tiamat and because of POV disputes, information relating to this theory has been supressed by POV contributors. Are administrators going to delete this page but allow Tinfoil hat?--AI 02:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Indeed notable. While it may seem nonsense at first glance, research proves otherwise. Wikia c c 21:19, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zecharia Sitchin's theories belong in Zecharia Sitchin. Every planet he dreams up doesn't rate an article of its own. (I mean, who is he, Gene Roddenbery?) Isaac R 02:45, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * If Zecharia Sitchin is the only major proponent of this then merge and redirect to Zecharia Sitchin. RJFJR 01:19, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. The only excuse for this article would be if it contains too much info to merge into Zecharia Sitchin. Apparently, it does not contain too much info. Merge would be a sensible option. Decius 16:39, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.