Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tian Bing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 09:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Tian Bing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notable wrestler. It's just a develoment wrestler with WWE with just a few matches. It's too son for this article. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Here is the logic: if he was released tomorrow has he done enough to be notable? Not yet, he may or may not end up being notable but that'd be WP:CRYSTALBALL'ing at the moment.  MPJ  -DK 22:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - There is quite a few sources that talk about him in depth Yahoo Sports, Sky Sports, Bleacher Report, Sportskeedia, UK Magazine The Sun (Unreliable as a source for BLPs, but should still prove some notability), and even the South China Morning Post.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:32, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Based on Lee's sources, although some are not RS, i believe he has provided enough to meet WP:GNG. -  Galatz Talk  17:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - as the first Chinese person to compete in WWE, he has received significant coverage from both Chinese- and English-language media, as shown by Lee Vilenski above. Meets WP:GNG. -Zanhe (talk) 22:58, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep His on stage performance doesn't matter, WP:GNG already met when he sign the contract. --Skyfiler (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * How? That is not in the guideline.  MPJ  -DK 17:26, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * multiple reports with significant coverage from independent news agencies like Reuters and the Sun.--Skyfiler (talk) 02:17, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Which was not your comments before.  MPJ  -DK 02:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve. The article, in its current form, obviously does not establish the subject's notability. However, the multiple RS discovered by Lee Vilenski should help it easily pass the GNG. Chetsford (talk) 20:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.