Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiane Brown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Tiane Brown

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local crime. Fails NN criteria. See WP:CRIME. red dog six (talk) 03:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete terribly tragic case, but sad to say it happens all the time nowadays. WP:VICTIM, WP:GNG, etc. Ruby   Murray  03:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - I have been watching this article for a week or so now trying to figure out what my opinion about it is. And from what I can see this is a case of WP:CRIME. However the article definitly needs sourcing and a copyedit but that is not a good reason for deletion. Contact the article creator if it is kept.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:37, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - How does what you said justify keeping the article per Wikipedia guidelines?  red dog six  (talk) 21:09, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Borderline keep, for the moment - currently it is too WP:RECENT to tell on WP:GNG. A move WP:VICTIM to Murder of Tiane Brown would be needed. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:45, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong delete definitely fails WP:CRIME "historic significance is indicated by persistent coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources that devote significant attention to the individual's role" is not demonstrated. LibStar (talk) 06:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.