Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiarn Powell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete based on consensus around the GNG threshold, since specific notability guidance are presumptions subordinate to the general guideline.  Go  Phightins  !  23:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Tiarn Powell

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD was added last year due to WP:NFOOTBALL failure and was removed with ''According to its article, this is the top-level national league. By insisting that it is not "professional", you are making the sexist argument that women can never be notable in this sport.''

While searching for coverage to see if Powell could pass WP:GNG, I did a search focused on Australian sources. The best that I could find were a trivial mention and quote in The Transcontinental and an article in The Sydney Daily Telegraph, which is a long quote from her but contains no actual significant coverage of Powell herself. The notability that GNG requires must come from other people writing about Powell. There is nothing in this article nor outside of it that establishes why Powell is notable. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:10, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:10, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG. I do believe it passes NFOOTBALL. Noah!💬 18:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It doesn't: the W-League is not listed as a fully professional league. Nehme1499 20:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per above fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Cuoxo (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked for UPE, sockpuppetry. MER-C 18:13, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Simione001 (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.