Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiburon Incorporated


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 02:25, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Tiburon Incorporated

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sources in the article do not provide substantial in-depth coverage of the subject. I have searched for sources to see whether WP:CORP is met but only found a local newspaper discussing a court case and very brief mentions also in local news:. Other than that there was only press releases or routine coverage of a merger in a specialist publication. SmartSE (talk) 22:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, once the PR fluff was trimmed out of the article, there was nothing left. Brianhe (talk) 15:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 03:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 03:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 03:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete per nom. CorporateM (Talk) 01:46, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I checked the sources: They simply mention that this company has received a contract of one kind or another. Nothing substantive. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect - to owner Gores Group. The Baltimore Sun article is significant coverage, about problems with a large contract in a major city. but the other refs are weak as noted above, and with only one solid RS significant coverage source, notability is not estabilshed. A redirect to the notable parent company is reasonable. Dialectric (talk) 10:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as my searches found nothing good and convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  17:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.