Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tickle.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. If there really are only two independent sources, that's not sufficient to establish notability, so no consensus to keep. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:36, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Tickle.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As it is right now, this page will probably fail WP:GNG. Besides, there's hardly any reliable coverage about the website I can find on the web. « « «  SOME GADGET GEEK  » » » (talk) 00:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   00:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   00:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   00:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam with no indications of notability or significance. Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle for minor tech startups. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:30, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Did you not see the independent secondary WP:RS? --David Tornheim (talk) 04:18, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep has two independent sources--one is NYT.  --David Tornheim (talk) 04:18, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * keep per david Dloh cierekim  04:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 20:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.