Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiers (video games)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 08:15, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Tiers (video games)
In this unsourced article, it seems as though a common term (tier) is borrowed to create a subject. As it stands, it violates WP:NOR. PJM 11:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Grafikm_fr 11:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless substantially verified.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, it just needs sources. Top tier (fighting games) should be merged in to this article as well.  Also notice the history on Top tier; specfically this version.  If this information has been created three times independently, it should be preserved in Wikipedia.  --  stillnotelf   is invisible  13:21, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I would not object to a merge into Top tier (fighting games), as long as that article is properly sourced. PJM 13:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Top tier (fighting games) should also be deleted as unsourced WP:NOR. &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 21:43, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete apparent original research. And it's not always tiers, either.  This is just game fans looking for more and differnt ways to say the same thing; much better to go out and find something different to write about. Just zis Guy you know? 15:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Just zis Guy<* /span> you know?. Hirudo 22:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, it is a common term and concept in many message boards across the internet regarding fighting games. Deserves its own article.  Silverleaftree 02:47, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * in many message boards across the internet: This is why I've had so much trouble finding a "source" to make this verified - it's not like anyone would publish transcripts of message boards, and since all the major ones (GameFAQs) purge often, no links would be stable. -- stillnotelf   is invisible  02:56, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, unless substantially verified (message boards, indeed...aren't there print publications about video games, or don't video game players read (printed material)). &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 21:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Libraries rarely bother to collect video game publications. The fact that it exists doesn't mean it's easy to get to without buying it oneself. --  stillnotelf   is invisible  22:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete . verifiability problem. Mukadderat 17:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment to the closing admin - please userfy this to User:Stillnotelf/Tiers (video games) if it gets deleted; that way we can save the history if I ever find sources for it. Thanks.  --  stillnotelf   is invisible  18:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Runcorn 22:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.