Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tietgenbyen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, the nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Tietgenbyen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

What makes this area/company/project notable? My BEFORE did not find anything but few mentions in passing, although maybe there is something in Danish? If you think there are good sources, please add them to the article or list on talk. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  07:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: The article should pass GNG now. If necessary, I can provide more sources directly related to Tietgenbyen (i.e. not about the data center). ― Hebsen (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, plenty of third party refs, passes WP:GNG as there is WP:SIGCOV. --Soman (talk) 13:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY, Hebsen improved the article considerably. — Toughpigs (talk) 15:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Withdraw. Thank you for the expansion. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 00:28, 18 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.