Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Briscoe (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Boston Tea Party (political party).  MBisanz  talk 01:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Tiffany Briscoe
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails both the general notability guideline and WP:POLITICIAN. The article survived the first Afd based on the fact that she was the nominee of the Boston Tea Party, which at the time she was. However, (as detailed in the article) she was later removed as the nominee by the BTP well before the election (and before the party disbanded), apparently for misrepresenting her credentials (see Talk:Tiffany Briscoe). She didn't appear on any state ballots in the 2012 election, and article's citations are mostly non-reliable sources and dead links. Clearly non-notable and should be deleted. Ddcm8991 (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * redirect to Boston Tea Party (political party) where she is mentioned. Valenciano (talk) 08:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Ddcm8991 (talk) 22:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete; there does not appear to be sufficient reliable sources where the subject has received significant coverage to warrant the subject meet WP:POLITICIAN and WP:ANYBIO. The subject has received multiple passing mentions, however the subject is connected to the event of the 2012 Presidential Election but is not independently notable outside of the event. Therefore, a better redirect target may be United States presidential election, 2012.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Oh, please. No Reliable Sources are provided at the article, and it does not appear that any Reliable Sources took notice of her. Not worth a redirect. The grand total of votes that were cast for her in the party's "online nominating process open to all BTP members" was 13 votes out of 20, according to Boston Tea Party (political party). (The actual link appears to be dead, not surprising since the party is defunct). Surely there has to be SOME kind of minimum support requirement before a "party nominee" becomes notable! --MelanieN (talk) 01:47, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.