Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Limos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:37, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Tiffany Limos

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Originally nominated for deletion by who previously marked the article for speedy deletion, for which it did not qualify. AfD wasn't filed correctly. I'm correcting the nomination. Submitter posted the comments below to the AFD talk page... -- Longhair\talk 07:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

''Aloha nō, aloha kākou! This page provides no more information being here, than if it were not here. The arguments on the talk page over the whole "porn" issue are getting old and quite annoying. Please, admin, help the Wiki Community by deleting this page once and for all. Mahalo ā nui loa! ''-- Kanaka maoli i puuwai 05:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

NOTE TO ADMIN I've removed most of mine and Jaynekennedy's arguments from this page as they are unrelated to the article itself and don't belong here. If user 'Jaynekennedy' feels the need to continue they can write on my talk page. Warren85 03:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep -- meets WP:BIO. Notable film actor. - Longhair\talk 07:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I'd say she has name recognition. She certainly appears to have appeared in several high-profile magazines. She's had large roles in two cult films. Also, I find the whole discussion about her being a "porn actress" to be immature, repugnant and not suited to Wikipedia. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 10:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - that some people are immature on the talk page is not reason for deletion. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 12:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep ´notable known person... just hope it expands.... Desertson 14:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * KEEP There is plenty of evidence that she is not a porn actress. None of her movies have been distributed by porn distributors and she is not known as a porn star.  She has recognition and she has appeared on several tv shows and high profile magazines.  She is a cult figure and should stay on here. Jaynekennedy 04:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable film industry personality. Is that better? Warren85 02:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * NOTE TO CLOSING ADMIN: Have removed User:Warren85's comments from the record and formally warned him for libel ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 23:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't see how stating a fact is "libel". Perhaps you should look up the meaning on this website. Warren85 02:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I should also note that Jayne Kennedy's articles were originally posted under another username, being Alfredoorozco. You can verify this in the history section and through here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tiffany_Limos&oldid=122893735.  They changed their name on this thing because they didn't want it to be shown that they themselves were slandering against Rosario Dawson's page. Warren85 04:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * DELETE Warren is not slandering against Limos - he is right. She is a nobody actress, and in my opinion, not worthy of a Wikipedia article; —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lach Graham (talk • contribs) 07:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Strong Keep. She easily meets WP:BIO.  How did this process become such a hostile flame war? -Seidenstud 12:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It has been written elsewhere on Wikipedia that IMDb is not a reliable source because it is "user edited", but I disagree with that assertion.  IMDb actually goes through the trouble of fact checking their information now.  Dropping some additional sources would be advisable though.  Burntsauce 17:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Once again, removed more personal attacks from this 'Jaynekennedy' person. Like I said, if you want to do that post it on my talk page.  Otherwise it has nothing to do with the subject.  Whether I have a website or posted comments on another website has nothing to do with this article.  The wikipedia admins only make judgements based on what happens on THEIR site.  I've stopped so why can't you? Warren85 05:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - non notable entity in the movie world. Mahalia56 04:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.