Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Page


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. v/r - TP 01:00, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Tiffany Page

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a non-notable artist and the page information is incorrect and I have found no sources to back up a lot of the information, such as if the artist is really dead or if her singles or albums really charted in all those different countries. LongLiveMusic (talk) 15:44, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I've restored that large portion of the article that was deleted with the AfD nomination edit. AllyD (talk) 16:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment 2 I now see that this article has been being subjected to what looks like lots of bizarre IP vandalism, adding unreliable information, so I stripped the discography back to what looks like a safe point. Given what's been happening here, the article needs protected? AllyD (talk) 16:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Neutral The damage done to the article isn't really a justification for deletion. As to whether she meets the Notability criteria, #1 might be argued by the UK press attention (Guardian 2009 article, Daily Telegraph 2010, Daily Mail 2010) but it feels more like comment on PR push than solid critical attention. So more would be needed. AllyD (talk) 16:50, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Is mentioned in reliable sources.♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Combining the Telegraph write-up already referenced in the article, the three sources listed above by AllyD, non-trivial coverage at Allmusic and Spinner, an album review and two livereviews, I'm satisfied that this person passes WP:GNG and criterion 1 of WP:MUSICBIO.  Gongshow  Talk 21:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep – Topic's notability is established per reliable sources listed above by user Gongshow. Topic passes WP:BAND, number 1. Northamerica1000 (talk) 06:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.