Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Towers (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Tiffany Towers
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Fails WP:PORNBIO; no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline; no potential for article expansion beyond the existing stub. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:58, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this pornographic actress. Joe Chill (talk) 18:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Fails PORNBIO and GNG, although AVN calls her "legendary" . Epbr123 (talk) 19:11, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That's a presskit piece, see virtually the same text at . AVN's website doesn't do a very good job of distinguishing between its own reporting and its posting of PR/promotional stuff. I'd say the former appears good as an RS and for establishing notability, not so the latter. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:56, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - failing verification of pornbio. one good way of distinguishing PR releases in AVN is the lack of an author byline. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.