Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger By the Tail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SK2242 (talk) 03:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Tiger By the Tail

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NBOOK. Lettlerhello • contribs 22:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 22:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete - as mentioned already, I agree that if fails WP:NBOOK. Additionally, the article is unsourced and the article is lacking in information Eyebeller (talk) 00:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to James Hadley Chase. I couldn't find any reviews for this or anything. It's possible that there are some out there "offline" though due to when the book was originally printed. Given that, I think it's at least a redirect to the authors article if nothing else. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I reworked the article a bit, adding the information about The Man in the Raincoat (1957) film based on this book as well as references to some linguistic studies where this book is mentioned.--Bbarmadillo (talk) 10:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Undoubtedly a low-quality article. But that should be addressed through editing, not deletion. "Perfection is not required: Wikipedia is a work in progress. Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome. For instance, one person may start an article with an overview of a subject or a few random facts." - WP:IMPERFECT. "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." - WP:ATD. Regarding notability, please see: 1 2 3 4 — Ad Meliora Talk∕Contribs 12:11, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, while understanding the nomination, this is a good example of WP:HEYMAN. Clearly meets notability criteria after recent additions by . Onel 5969  TT me 17:16, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep needs exansion.122.60.173.107 (talk) 07:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:NBOOK, has multiple independent reviews, article now reflects this. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.