Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Lily (Rupert)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Rupert Bear. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:41, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Tiger Lily (Rupert)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a minor character with questionable notability without sources to assert notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 02:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's really nothing out there to show that this particular character is notable outside of the series. I'm not even particularly sure that a redirect would really be necessary either.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:35, 28 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Keep I had no trouble finding a source. Warden (talk) 15:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you share with us what these sources are? --Lambiam 18:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Most of the stuff I found talked about her more in the scope of the Rupert universe, so I wasn't really sure if those counted as sources that showed that she was notable outside of the series.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 02:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 15:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Harmless, but would be much better as a section in the main Rupert article. I would want to see at least one other source for notability. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Rupert Bear – unless the Colonel reveals to the rest of us what these sources are he had no trouble finding, assuming they are reliable, independent, and give non-trivial coverage, in which case we can simply Keep the article. --Lambiam 18:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I think he added the source to the article. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 19:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Google books gives me no hits that relate that source to Tiger Lily. The reference in the article is presented only for the statement that the character was created by Bestall. --Lambiam 06:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes, better as a section in the main Rupert article. Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:19, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.