Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger count


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 19:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Tiger count

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:SOAP, WP:NOT and WP:NOTFORUM (if users follow the "This page will attempt to create a census based upon actual observation by the public" prompt) StaticGull Talk  12:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

This information is not available from any other resource. Wikipedia has an opportunity here to help save the tiger from extinction by encouraging collaboration from around the globe. I would hate to see the best chance the tigers have be lost. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.104.130 (talk) 13:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * If Wikipedia is the best hope the tigers have, I'm sorry for the tigers. Have you considered discussing it with the World Wide Fund for Nature?  They might be able to host a page.  How about your local green party or maybe Greenpeace?  Anyway, StaticGull was right, Wikipedia is not the right home for this page. Delete.--Slashme (talk) 14:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete — Wikipedia is not an advertising or marketing vehicle, nor is it your web host. With that said, I hope the best for the tigers. MuZemike (talk) 20:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This appears to be a synthesis or compilation of original research. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.