Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tigva River


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (Non administrator closure.)--Oakshade (talk) 19:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Tigva River

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

useless,not important SaiyanEmperor2008 (talk) 15:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The issue has been discussed various times. There is no criterion for the minimum acceptable size for rivers.Afil (talk) 02:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep It is informative. Seighean (talk) 03:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as valid and sufficiently notable. But why is there no AfD notice on the page itself?  The last edit was in October 08.  --Lockley (talk) 04:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.