Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiiiiiiiiiip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. self-promotion for non-notable person Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Tiiiiiiiiiip

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The topic may not be notable enough; in addition, the creator of this article seems to be the DJ itself, and the tone of the article is like an advertisement. Article was deleted yesterday under similar conditions (reason was G11: "The topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own as none of the sources here are substantially convincing and significant"). Jumpytoo Talk 19:59, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:MUSICBIO. No notable chart-toppers or music awards. Comatmebro  (talk) 20:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete not a notable performer at this time. Speedy recommendation based on nom. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:59, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.